Assessment Form Internship/Literature Study
Faculty of Medicine VU Amsterdam


READ THIS BEFORE START ASSESSMENT

Please check the Criteria Guidelines in the Internship Regulations and Literature Study Regulations for information about the different criteria and how to grade them.

Fill in the student number to automatically supplement placement information (please check if correct).

 

dd/mm/yyyy
dd/mm/yyyy
 

Assessment

Assessment criteria Internship Faculty of Medicine VU

The assessment matrix described in the Regulations for Internships should be used as a guideline for internship supervisors in the assessment of students enrolled in the Master Oncology or Master Cardiovascular Research program of the Faculty of Medicine VU Amsterdam.

Plagiarism

The report will be checked for plagiarism by the program coordinator. A copy can be obtained via: masteroncology.vu@amsterdamumc.nl / masterpersonalizedmedicine-vu@amsterdamumc.nl

Assessment criteria Literature Study Faculty of Medicine VU

The assessment matrix described in the Regulations for Literature Study should be used as a guideline for Literature Study supervisors in the assessment of students enrolled in the master Oncology or master Personalized Medicine program of the Faculty of Medicine VU Amsterdam.

Plagiarism

The report will be checked for plagiarism by the Program coordinator. A copy can be obtained via: masteroncology.vu@amsterdamumc.nl / masterpersonalizedmedicine-vu@amsterdamumc.nl

Practical work Minor Internship (Supervisor/Assessor)
Attitude
 
Professional behaviour
 
Practical Skills
 
 
 
 
 


Presentation Minor Internship (Assessor)
Presenting skills
 
Discussion
Presentation
 
 
 
 
 


Written report Minor Internship (Assessor)
Writing process
 
Report
 
 
 
 


Practical work Major Internship (Supervisor/Assessor)
Attitude
 
Professional behaviour
Practical Skills
 
 
 
 
 


Presentation Major Internship (Assessor)
Presenting skills
 
Discussion
Presentation
 
 
 
 
 


Written report Major Internship (Assessor)
Writing process
 
Report
 
 
 
 


Survey Outline Literature Study (Assessor)
Writing process
 


Presentation Literature Study (Assessor)
Presenting skills
 
Discussion
Presentation
 


Written report Literature Study (Assessor)
Writing process
 
Report
 
 


Grades Minor Internship
Assessor
 

Grades Major Internship
Assessor
 

Grades Literature Study
Supervisor 1
 

Examiner (TO BE FILLED IN BY THE EXAMINER AFTER RECEIVING THE FORM, NOT ALLOWED TO BE FILLED IN BY THE ASSESSOR)

 

Written report (independent assessor) (WILL BE ADDED BY THE EXAMINER AFTER RECEIVING THE INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT, NOT ALLOWED TO BE FILLED IN BY ASSESSOR)

Examiner Internshops Oncology / Personalized Medicine


Written report (independent assessor 2)

Examiner Internships Oncology / Personalized Medicine


* = Input is required
 
This form uses Ajax. This is a technique that is not supported by your browser. Unfortunately it is not possible for you to complete the form.
University where you have performed your Internship or Literature Study.
Department where you have performed your Internship or Literature Study.
This is the Principal Investigator.
This is your day to day supervisor.
Number of weeks performing the Internship/Literature Study excluding courses and holidays.
Total number of weeks times 1.5.
The student has a pro-active work ethic
The student can independently perform the experiments and critically interpret the results 
The student participates effectively in a multi-disciplinary research team
The student quickly shows newly acquired theoretical knowledge and practical skills
The student comes up with suggestions for experiments to improve the project or adjust the experiments/design of the project
The student shows knowledge of the rules and (safety) regulations of the lab 
The student can accurately perform the right experiments related to the research question
The student can perform experiments in a timely and structured fashion
The student can determine the relevance of his/her results and design the next experiments accordingly
The student presents clearly and concisely
The student reflects on the results of his/her practical training
The student shows he/she masters the English language
The student discusses the presentation and answers questions
The student gives a presentation in the allotted time
The student uses clear slides to explain a coherent story
The student explains the subject matter in a cohesive way
The student independently gathers and interprets the results and literature
The abstract is concise including the aim of the project, the relevant results and important conclusions
The students interprets the literature well
The introduction reflects the background of the project including the aim. Is it not too long with too many details
The student interprets the obtained results well
The materials and methods are accurate including the right details
The report is balanced and clearly presented
The main findings are correctly reflected in either figures or tables
The findings are discussed and reflected upon current literature
The correct conclusion is drawn and put into context of the current literature
The student has a pro-active work ethic
The student can independently perform the experiments and critically interpret the results 
The student participates effectively in a multi-disciplinary research team
The student quickly shows newly acquired theoretical knowledge and practical skills
The student comes up with suggestions for experiments to improve the project or adjust the experiments/design of the project
The student shows knowledge of the rules and (safety) regulations of the lab 
The student can accurately perform the right experiments related to the research question
The student can perform experiments in a timely and structured fashion
The student can determine the relevance of his/her results and design the next experiments accordingly
The student presents clearly and concisely
The student reflects on the results of his/her practical training / able to discuss the results
The student shows he/she masters the English language
The student discusses the presentation and answers questions
The student gives a presentation in the allotted time
The student uses clear slides to explain a coherent story
The student explains the subject matter in a cohesive way
The student independently gathers and interprets the results and literature
The abstract is concise including the aim of the project, the relevant results and important conclusions
The students interprets the literature well
The introduction reflects the background of the project including the aim. Is it not too long with too many details
The student interprets the obtained results well
The materials and methods are accurate including the right details
The report is balanced and clearly presented
The main findings are correctly reflected in either figures or tables
The findings are discussed and reflected upon current literature
The correct conclusion is drawn and put into context of the current literature
The student independently gathers and interprets the  results and literature
The students interprets the literature well
The student interprets the literature well and is able to translate it into effective writing in the required amount of time.
The report is balanced and clearly presented
The content accurately covers the field of interest
The student presents clearly and concisely
The student reflects on the content of his/her literature thesis and put the questions in a broader context.
The student shows he/she masters the English language
The student discusses the presentation and answers questions
The student gives a presentation in the allotted time
The student uses clear slides to explain a coherent story
The student explains the subject matter in a cohesive way
The student independently gathers and interprets the results and literature
The abstract is concise including the aim of the project, the relevant results and important conclusions
The students interprets the literature well
The introduction reflects the background of the project including the aim. Is it not too long with too many details
The findings are discussed and reflected upon current literature
The report is understandable and easy to follow. It contains all the components in a logical order and the findings answer the research question in a good, clear way.
The report is balanced and clearly presented
The correct conclusion is drawn and put into context of the current literature
Only the examinaor internships Oncology (Victor Thijssen) or Personalized Medicine (Nina Hauck) is allowed to confirm the final grade after receiving the form of the assessor and the form of the independent assessor. 
Average between assessor and independent assessor report grade
Average between assessor, independent assessor and 2nd independent assessor report grade